Wartime Lies:

A Consumer's Guide to the Bombing

Paul Bass, New Haven Advocate

October 8, 2001

"George Bush is the president, he makes the decisions, and, you know, as just one American, he wants me to line up, just tell me where." -- CBS News anchor Dan Rather, after the Sept. 11 attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center Here come "surgical strikes"! Check out that "laser-guided" "pinpoint precision." "Collateral damage"? Hardly any. It's a glorious war, a noble cause, the only solution to a world crisis.... So we heard in the Gulf War. So we hear at the onset of the Afghan war. Many of the same characters who ran and propagandized the last war -- Colin Powell and Dan Rather, for instance -- have returned to our living rooms. Last time, it turned out there was more to the story. In the first days of CNN-fueled war hysteria, we couldn't know the truth about whom we bombed, or to what end. It's the same this week as our bombs began raining on Afghanistan. It's hard to know the truth about what's happening -- and therefore impossible to judge whether the action is justified. We can assume only this: Right or wrong, the government is lying to us. And the media is repeating and magnifying those lies in order to convince us to put our brains on hold and yell for blood behind a waving pennant of the stars and stripes. They did it last time.

Last Time's Lies

Consider ABC News' Sam Donaldson. He helped convince the nation that Star Wars works, through his live coverage of the Persian Gulf War. On Jan. 22, 1991, ABC showed a bright object flashing through the sky. Another bright object raced toward it. Donaldson told viewers that one of Saddam Hussein's Scud missiles was heading toward Saudi Arabia. But here came a good old U.S.-made Patriot missile to the rescue. "Bull's-eye!" Donaldson proclaimed. "No more Scud!" Such media accounts -- and parroting of government claims that Patriot missiles hit almost every Scud they aimed at -- led to a public celebration of the Patriot missile. We weren't powerless. America was strong! We could stop enemy weapons. That November, Congress boosted the budget for the "Star Wars" anti-missile shield from $3.1 billion to $4.15 billion. The following year, as Columbia Journalism Review would report ("Patriot Games," July/August 1992), that film clip showed up at a Congressional hearing concerning inflated military claims. Pointing to the same clip Donaldson had narrated, a former nuclear weapons analyst pointed out that the Scud passed through whatever explosion appeared on the screen -- and that Patriots were a "total failure" in the Gulf War.

Some other examples of Gulf War lies (courtesy of Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting):

What to Watch Out:

For While we rely on government and CNN, CBS, et al for our first torrent of war news, history gives us some advice in filtering the noise: