Sound Travels FAQ

By Darren Copeland & Chris Rolfe


What is Sound Travels?
Sound Travels is a series of concerts and residencies for automated multi-channel diffusion of electroacoustic music. The concerts and residencies take place across Canada and around the world.
The residencies involve collaboration with a host studio or concert presenter who provides a working environment for local composers to realize multi-channel diffusion. The residencies last seven to thirty days depending on the number of composers participating and location availability.
The concerts take place immediately after the residencies in a host city, or they take place elsewhere on special invitation. The repertoire for these concerts is derived from current and/or past residencies.

Back to FAQ Contents

 

What is electroacoustic music?
Very broadly defined electroacoustic music is music that necessitates amplification, electrification, and/or digital computation in its conception and presentation. One could claim that almost all music heard today is electroacoustic music since the art of studio recording is so pervasive in the music industry. However, most recorded music is merely using electroacoustic techniques to replace live public performance in communications media. A listener will still identify Glenn Gould's recording of the Goldberg Variations as being a performed interpretation of that work despite the extensive intervention of the recording medium in its realization. Electricity or digital computation is an integral part of the composition process in electroacoustic music. This is particularly evident to the extent that certain musical parameters are explored far more extensively in electroacoustic music than they would be in other musical genres. In particular, timbre and space are two parameters that are given primary attention in electroacoustic music, whereas in most other genres they generally play a subservient part.
Unlike the more popular forms of electronic music like techno, electroacoustic music is presented in the public as a foreground event where the context is subservient to the experience of listening to the music rather than the other way around.
There are a number of styles or branches of electroacoustic music. There are composers concerned only with realizing works in a studio, whereas there are others who devote their work to live performance. There are composers who draw on environmental sounds, there are others who generate sounds through synthesis, and there are others who use computational analysis of instrumental or environmental sounds to generate their sound palette. There are indeed further sub-categories and points of differentiation, but this is enough to provide a general impression.
To survey current activity in electroacoustics visit the Electronic Music Foundation who have links on their sites to many composers, studios, and concert presenters around the world. The communauté électroacoustique Canadienne/Canadian electroacoustic community (CEC) also have an extensive resource on line with many sound clips.
To meet active practitioners in the field and discuss the art form with them subscribe to cecdiscuss by emailing <Majordomo@concordia.ca> with the following command in the body of your email message: subscribe cecdiscuss.

Back to FAQ Contents

 

What is diffusion?
Diffusion means, literally, to spread or disseminate. In electroacoustic music, diffusion may refer to the broadcast medium used to present a composed work, but, more usually, it will imply an electroacoustic performance technique where studio material is interpreted by a solo performer to a live concert audience using multiple loudspeakers.

Back to FAQ Contents

What is automated multi-channel diffusion?
In the case of Sound Travels multi-channel refers to the fact that eight channels of input are being distributed to an array of eight loudspeakers. This is unlike earlier practices of electroacoustic diffusion where commonly a two-channel source was projected on mass to a multiple array of loudspeakers. The major difference here is that multiple voices occurring simultaneously in a work can be diffused independently.
Automated refers to the process of diffusion that warrants the need for the residencies. Put simply, automation involves programming computerized commands so that diffusion moves can occur hands-free. This allows the composer to concentrate completely on listening, which is important, because diffusion is a tricky business psychoacoustically speaking.

Back to FAQ Contents

 
How is diffusion done at a Sound Travels residency?
The composers participating in Sound Travels use a digital-mixing matrix called the Richmond Sound Design DM1616 Audiobox designed by Tim Bartoo of Harmonic Functions and distributed commercially by Richmond Sound Design. An 8 channel digital tape with SMPTE time code is routed into the Audiobox, which is connected to 8 independent channels of amplification.
The Audiobox enables the composer to access all of the 64 points on the matrix at any one time, and because of the sheer complexity of this task, automate this access for playback. For example, with this diffusion method the composer can distribute a sustained low sound to all of the speakers, while moving one sound from the back-left to front-right and distributing a third sound across the entire front area. These assignments can all change dynamically over time with a process of crossfading from one state to another. Automated gain, delay, and equalization control is provided on every input and output channel. The Audiobox in actual fact has 16 outputs and 16 inputs. However, for various economical and practical reasons, the Audiobox is used in an 8 X 8 configuration for Sound Travels.
Because the AudioBox has no control surface it relies on software programs to translate the user's intentions into commands that the hardware can understand. A Macintosh program called ABControl written by Chris Rolfe of Third Monk Software performs this task very well. It functions largely like a conventional mixer but offers a number of interesting features that go beyond conventional mixing paradigms to provide controls that allow diffusion to be handled in a musical and transparent manner.

Back to FAQ Contents

 

What happened to Live Diffusion?
Sound Travels does not wish to turn its back on the grace and spontaneity of live musical control. Therefore it has invited David Eagle and his midi controller the aXi0 (Alternative Expressive Input Object) to join its production team. The 2001season will focus on developing diffusion strategies using both the Audiobox and aXi0 in tandem to marry the musical complexity and versatility of automated control with the finite sensitivity and responsiveness of a musical instrument.

Back to FAQ Contents

 

 

 

What is the aXi0?
The aXi0 (Alternative Expressive Input Object) is a digital instrument/controller, which provides expression and multi-dimensional control of synthesizers, samplers and other digital media. It is played with both hands on three distinct playing surfaces:
- A sophisticated palm-rest joystick for the left hand,
- A velocity-sensitive keyboard for the right hand, and,
- Running up the performer's shoulder, an array of buttons used to change voices or trigger events (i.e. QuickTime movies, sound files, MIDI or image sequences, diffusion sequences).
In a recent work (Prelude by David Eagle) realized at the Sound Travels residency in Banff (2000), the aXi0 controlled 8-channel sound diffusion using the Audiobox and ABControl software. It quickly became apparent that this was an ideal match: by translating live performance gestures on the joystick of the aXi0 into spatial motion of sound through the surrounding loudspeakers, sound diffusion becomes part of the musical interpretation, aspects which otherwise would have been automated.
For further information on the aXi0, visit David Eagle's web page. 
David Eagle playing the aXi0.

Back to FAQ Contents

 

Where are the loudspeakers positioned?
 
Two formations of loudspeakers are generally used at Sound Travels. The "double diamond" configuration has proven favourable in rooms that enable speakers to be placed in a perfect circle while the "four pairs" configuration operates better in rooms that are more rectangular, or particularly narrow (see links below for diagrams that indicate speaker channeling). ABControl enables the user to change from one speaker configuration to another. For instance, it will re-calculate the relative levels of output according to changes in speaker angle and channel numbering. Further refinements can be added in performance according to the dictates of the situation, such as delay or equalization or further level changes to individual input and output channels.
The ABControl program can be used to its full advantage by placing the loudspeakers at the same elevation as the audience. However, one can cheat the program by placing certain speakers at higher elevations and using this to good effect as well.
Four Pairs Configuration
 
 Double Diamond Configuration
 
 
 
 
Back to FAQ Contents
 
Why is Sound Travels diffusion not done with Dolby Surround, Ambisonic, Holophonics, and other surround sound techniques?
Dolby Surround is a multi-channel format, but is not, in fact, a localization technique. It is an encoding/decoding standard used to distribute multi-channel audio. Dolby Surround uses a combination of tricks to squeeze 5.1 channels, that is, five discrete channels (usually Left, Center, Right and SurroundLeft+Right) plus one bass channel into the space occupied by two. Channel content is entirely up to the audio engineer. Conventional movie post-production usually places dialogue in the Center, stereo processing on Left and Right, and ambient material on the band-limited (100 Hz to 7 kHz), compressed (Dolby-B) Surround channel(s).
Surround sound is generally not as bleeding-edge as the marketing hype would lead one to believe. Simply wiring an extra few speakers out-of-phase with a slight delay, and perhaps adding a sub-woofer on a crossover circuit, duplicates a surround sound effect.
Soundfield microphone approaches, like Ambisonics, are more interesting, because they use a special microphone to capture the original spatial information. A soundfield microphone, an XY stereo pair, for instance, seeks to capture the original source localization, and like stereo micing, is a very effective approach. Ambisonics even takes the XY pair a step further to include the vertical or Z-axis. And in theory, Ambisonic B-format material can be mixed and edited in a relatively straightforward manner; unfortunately, commercial audio editors do not currently support the format. Additionally, although soundfield recording is effective for mimetic sources, it does not provide any short cuts or advantages in diffusing discrete, monophonic material or synthetic stereo sources.
Most localization techniques, additionally, including the traditional phantom-image created by panning between stereo pairs, are to some degree sensitive to listener position. Although there might be a sweet spot from which to appreciate the depth and breadth of the localized image, those listeners who are positioned a few degrees off axis, or a few feet closer to one speaker do not apprehend the same effect. In other cases, material is inherently impossible to localize, like low frequencies for example.
Another family of so-called 3-D sound techniques, Head-Related Transfer Functions (HRTF's) are a prime example, but are inapplicable to loudspeaker reproduction. HRTF's model the reflections of the fleshy part of the ear in order to simulate location cues; these tiny reflections are, of course completely overwhelmed when played back over loudspeakers in a conventional room.
The main point, here, is that there is no easy, one-size-fits-all solution to the problem faced by electroacoustic composers in diffusing work.
The Richmond Sound Design AudioBox, which is controlled by ABControl, supports up to 16 discrete channels (it is, after all, a 16 by 16 mixer), there's no encoding to worry about, and your material won't be savaged by lousy compression. Even more importantly, the ABControl software provides practical tools to aid in realizing diffusion (sequencing, multi-channel panning, editing, etc.). ABControl tries to fill in the gap between multi-channel audio and multi-channel composition.

Back to FAQ Contents

 
What are the limitations and drawbacks of diffusing with the AudioBox?
The AudioBox, or more correctly, ABControl, uses a relatively simple equal-power panning scheme to create stereo phantom-images. Otherwise, it relies on discrete channels being sent to individual speakers. This is vastly preferable to most surround sound or soundfield approaches for the majority of electroacoustic music.
Research into the psychoacoustics of localization, however, suggests many additional techniques that could be incorporated, some of which are well-studied (global reverberation vs. local reverberation, and Doppler shift, to name two).
ABControl doesn't provide any explicit support for these localization techniques. On the other hand, it doesn't prohibit you from implementing them separately, as a pre- or post-process.

 Back to FAQ Contents

 
How to participate in Sound Travels?
Composers are invited to participate by host studios, presenters, and institutions, or by New Adventures in Sound. Unsolicited proposals directly from composers are accepted throughout the year, but please inquire before sending materials in the post.
Once invited, composers realizing studio-made works must arrive at the residency with an 8-channel submix of their piece that can be dubbed to a Tascam DA-88 tape machine or transferred directly to the internal harddrive of the audiobox in the format of 48khz wavfiles. When recording to DA-88 please insure that SMPTE time code is also recorded across the entire tape (see DA-88 manual for details). This 8-channel submix will then be diffused to 8 speakers using the AudioBox.
Studios, event presenters, and composers interested in participating in Sound Travels can write to New Adventures in Sound; 599B Yonge Street #201; Toronto, ON; M4Y 1Z4, Canada. Or send an email message to darcope@interlog.com

 Back to FAQ Contents

 
Who has participated in Sound Travels?
For an updated list of composers and residency participants, please refer to the Repertoire List. It lists participating composers and their respective works according to the particular Sound Travels residencies that have taken place since November 1998.

 Back to FAQ Contents

 
What have the critics said about Sound Travels?
By following these links you can read past reviews of Sound Travels events that are on line.
Apple - Design & Publishing - The Art of Sound
Musicworks Review by Josh Thorpe

  Back to FAQ Contents

 

What have past-participants said about Sound Travels?
From Chris Rolfe, Third Monk Software:
The opportunity to interact with a group of hip, savvy composers has been invaluable to Third Monk Software. There is very little applied research into multi-channel playback, but a great wealth of common practice, especially in Canada. The Sound Travels concert series is not our most lucrative venture, but it's certainly one of our most important and meaningful endeavours, and one which we will continue to support and encourage.
From Yves Daoust, compositeur, professeur-responsable du secteur électroacoustique au Conservatoire de Musique du Québec à Montréal.
Nous avons été heureux d'accueillir en janvier dernier monsieur Darren Copeland au Conservatoire de Musique de Montréal. Durant près d'un mois les étudiants de la classe d'électroacoustique du Conservatoire, auxquels se sont joints des étudiants invités des autres studios institutionnels montréalais, ont pu travailler sous la supervision de Darren Copeland à la préparation d'une diffusion multi-pistes automatisée d'une de leur oeuvre. L'atelier s'est terminé par deux concerts, l'un au Conservatoire et l'autre à l'université Concordia.
Je peux affirmer que tous les étudiants participants ont beaucoup apprécié cette Résidence" et en ont tiré un profit certain.
From Ned Bouhalassa, composer:
I have found that the residency that I undertook last November helped me to better understand what it means to compose for a multi-channel diffusion system. The freedom to test my mixes over the entire length of the residency was an added bonus. I had much experience projecting _stereo_ sound in a multi-channel system, but had not tried projecting multi-channel pieces, let alone composing directly for such a system. With independent movement of sound, it is possible to create a rich and complex sound environment where all the parts are clearly defined for the listener. The use of this system has forever changed the way that I think about composing for space in a multi-speaker context.
From Kenneth Newby, composer:
The opportunity to develop a portion of Seasonal Round in an immersive sonic environment brought the various sonic elements into a much tighter focus, heightening the drama, widening the contrasts, clarifying the spoken word. Given that the work is largely concerned with an engagement with the idea of the place of the Human in Nature, the multi-channel sound diffusion situation provided a particularly appropriate model in which to present the soundscapes that frame the spoken word.
From Lynda Hill, theatre artist:
The provision of time and equipment necessary to achieve a unique approach in spatialization within an 8-channel diffusion for the electroaacoustic portion of my sound/performance/installation piece Dark Forest meant a more effective expression of the overall intention of the work. The multi-channel spatialization of my sountrack allowed this element to become more of a kinetic compliment to the choreography of the performer and the audience's relationship to the environment of the installation.
 

  Back to FAQ Contents

 

 


Sound Travels Home | Sound Travels Introduction | A Practical Guide to Diffusion